WILLOSCAR avatar

rubric-writer

Write a rubric-based peer review report (`output/REVIEW.md`) using extracted claims and evidence gap

作者 WILLOSCAR|オープンソース

Rubric Writer

Transforms review evidence artifacts into the final paper-review deliverable.

Inputs

Required:

  • output/CLAIMS.md
  • output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md

Optional:

  • output/NOVELTY_MATRIX.md
  • DECISIONS.md

Output

  • output/REVIEW.md

Contract

The review must expose stable sections:

  • ### Summary
  • ### Novelty
  • ### Soundness
  • ### Clarity
  • ### Impact
  • ### Major Concerns
  • ### Minor Comments
  • ### Recommendation

Every major concern must cite its claim_id or gap_id. This is the traceability interface consumed by the paper-review scorecard.

Script boundary

scripts/run.py should:

  • read prior review artifacts
  • render the stable rubric sections
  • keep the review bounded and traceable

It should not re-parse the manuscript from scratch or perform retrieval.

Acceptance

  • output/REVIEW.md exists
  • includes all stable rubric sections
  • recommendation is explicit

Non-goals

  • deep manuscript parsing
  • novelty retrieval
  • writing an author rebuttal